People v Lee (Chrystal)

Annotate this Case
[*1] People v Lee (Chrystal) 2009 NY Slip Op 52455(U) [25 Misc 3d 141(A)] Decided on December 2, 2009 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on December 2, 2009
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM: 2nd, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : RIOS, J.P., PESCE and GOLIA, JJ
2006-1812 K CR.

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Chrystal Lee, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County (William L. McGuire, Jr., J.), rendered September 19, 2006. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree.


ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 265.01). In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon our review of the record, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt of two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]). Further, contrary to defendant's contention, there is not a grave risk that an innocent person has been convicted. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Rios, J.P., Pesce and Golia, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: December 02, 2009

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.