Crossbay Acupuncture, P.C. v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.
Annotate this CaseDecided on July 9, 2009
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM: 2nd, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : PESCE, P.J., GOLIA and RIOS, JJ
2008-853 K C.
Crossbay Acupuncture, P.C. a/a/o KELVIN MACK, Appellant,
against
Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., Respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Margaret
A. Chan, J.), entered October 5, 2007. The order denied plaintiff's motion for summary
judgment.
Order reversed without costs, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment granted and matter remitted to the Civil Court for the calculation of statutory interest and an assessment of attorney's fees.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment established plaintiff's prima facie entitlement to such relief (see Insurance Law § 5106; Mary Immaculate Hosp. v Allstate Ins. Co., 5 AD3d 742 [2004]; East Acupuncture, P.C. v Electric Ins. Co., 16 Misc 3d 128[A], 2007 NY Slip Op 51281[U] [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2007]). Defendant did not submit papers opposing plaintiff's motion. Consequently, the Civil Court improperly denied plaintiff's unopposed motion for summary judgment.
Accordingly, the order is reversed, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for the calculation of statutory interest and an assessment of attorney's fees pursuant to Insurance Law § 5106 (a) and the regulations promulgated thereunder.
Pesce, P.J., Golia and Rios, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: July 09, 2009
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.