People v Marlow (Elizabeth)
Annotate this CaseDecided on June 16, 2009
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM: 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : RUDOLPH, P.J., SCHEINKMAN and LaCAVA, JJ
2008-198 W CR.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
against
Elizabeth Marlow, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of Yonkers, Westchester County (Thomas R.
Daly, J.), rendered December 21, 2007. The judgment convicted defendant, after a nonjury trial,
of disorderly conduct.
Judgment of conviction affirmed.
Upon a review of the record on appeal, we are of the opinion that the evidence, when viewed
in the light most favorable to the People (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), was
legally sufficient to establish defendant's guilt of disorderly conduct (Penal Law § 240.20
[2]). Moreover, giving much deference to the trial court's verdict, particularly with respect to its
credibility determinations (see People v Lane, 7 NY3d 888, 890 [2006]; see also
People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633, 644-645 [2006]), even as we
conduct our own review of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342
[2007]), we find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. The People's case
was supported by consistent and credible testimony. In view of the foregoing, the judgment of
conviction is affirmed.
Rudolph, P.J., and LaCava, J., concur.
Scheinkman, J., taking no part.
Decision Date: June 16, 2009
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.