Baldwin v North Fork Bank

Annotate this Case
[*1] Baldwin v North Fork Bank 2004 NY Slip Op 51628(U) Decided on December 15, 2004 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on December 15, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM: 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: PESCE, P.J., PATTERSON and RIOS, JJ.
2003-1799 K C

CARL BALDWIN, Appellant,

against

NORTH FORK BANK, Respondent.

Appeal by plaintiff from a small claims judgment of the Civil Court, Kings County (S. Hinds-Radix, J.), entered on April 3, 2003, which dismissed the action.


Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.

Upon a review of the record in this small claims action, we find that substantial justice was done between the parties according to the rules and [*2]
principles of substantive law (CCA 1807). Even assuming that plaintiff made out a prima facie case of negligence against the defendant bank, plaintiff has nonetheless failed to establish damages through competent proof. The action was accordingly properly dismissed.
Decision Date: December 15, 2004

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.