Kakar v Hewlett-Packard Co.

Annotate this Case
[*1] Kakar v Hewlett-Packard Co. 2004 NY Slip Op 51546(U) Decided on December 8, 2004 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on December 8, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM: 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: PESCE, P.J., PATTERSON and RIOS, JJ.
2004-146 Q C

SUDHIR KAKAR, Appellant,

against

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Respondent.

Appeal by plaintiff from a small claims judgment of the Civil Court, Queens County (D. Pineda-Kirwan, J.), entered on June 26, 2003, in favor of defendant dismissing the action.


Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.

In this small claims action, plaintiff failed to establish the breach of a contract by defendant. In any event, plaintiff failed to present evidence of the extent of the
damages he allegedly sustained. Consequently, we find that substantial justice was done between the parties in accordance with the rules and principles of substantive law (CCA 1807).
Decision Date: December 08, 2004

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.