1077 Manhattan Assoc., LLC v Mendez

Annotate this Case
[*1] 1077 Manhattan Assoc., LLC v Mendez 2004 NY Slip Op 51315(U) Decided on November 1, 2004 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on November 1, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM: 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE TERM : 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS -x PRESENT : ARONIN, J.P., PATTERSON and RIOS, JJ.
2003-1310 K C -x

1077 MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES, LLC, Appellant,

against

AWILDA MENDEZ, Respondent. -x

Appeal by landlord from an order of the Civil Court, Kings County (M. Pinckney, J.), dated August 25, 2003, dismissing the petition.


Order unanimously affirmed with $10 costs.

Housing Court correctly determined that only a natural person and not a corporation can recover an apartment for personal use (Rent Stabilization Code [9 NYCRR] § 2524.4 [a] [1]; Fanelli v New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd., 90 AD2d 756 [1982], affd 58 NY2d 952 [1983]; George Tut & Co. v Ahmed-Zokari, NYLJ, Dec. 14, 2000 [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists]; S & J Realty Corp. v Korybut, 147 Misc
2d 259 [1990]) even when the principal of the corporation is its sole stockholder (Henrock Realty Corp. v Tuck, 52 AD2d 871 [1976]; Matter of Colin v Altman, 39 AD2d 200 [1972]).
Decision Date: November 01, 2004

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.