Lockett v Moore
Annotate this CaseDecided on October 20, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM: 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: ARONIN, J.P., PATTERSON and GOLIA, JJ.
2004-69 K C
SHERNELLA LOCKETT, Appellant,
against
PAUL MOORE, Respondent.
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the Civil Court, Kings County
(E. Spodek, J.), entered November 12, 2003, dismissing the complaint and awarding defendant $115 in costs and disbursements.
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.
Plaintiff commenced the instant action to recover damages for defendant's breach of an alleged oral agreement by which defendant agreed to pay her money after she paid for defendant's vehicle insurance and registration. She also sought to recover for mental anguish allegedly caused by defendant.
We agree with the court below that plaintiff failed to make out a prima facie case for breach of contract. We also note, incidentally, that damages for psychological injury resulting from a breach of contract are generally not recoverable (see 36 NY Jur 2d, Damages § 102).
A credibility issue was presented in this matter, and the court below, as the trier of fact, resolved the issues in favor of defendant. That determination was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence, and will not be disturbed on appeal (see DiSalvo v Ordway, 208 AD2d 798 [1994]).
Decision Date: October 20, 2004
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.