Suarez v Jamilano

Annotate this Case
[*1] Suarez v Jamilano 2004 NY Slip Op 51109(U) Decided on October 1, 2004 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on October 1, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM : 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE TERM : 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS -x PRESENT : McCABE, P.J., RUDOLPH and ANGIOLILLO, JJ.
x

EPIFANIA F. SUAREZ, Appellant,

against

LETECIA JAMILANO and CHERYLLE PAIMBAL, Respondents.

Appeal by plaintiff from a small claims judgment of the City Court, City of Yonkers, Westchester County (A. Doran, J.), entered August 27, 2002, in favor of defendants dismissing the action.


Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.

In this small claims action, plaintiff failed to present sufficient credible evidence to establish that the loss was the result of any action taken by defendants. Accordingly, substantial justice was done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law (UCCA 1807).
Decision Date: October 01, 2004

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.