People v Nimberger (Laszlo)

Annotate this Case
[*1] People v Nimberger (Laszlo) 2004 NY Slip Op 50836(U) Decided on July 21, 2004 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on July 21, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM : 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT:PESCE, P.J., GOLIA and RIOS, JJ.
NO. 2003-991 Q CR

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

against

LASZLO NIMBERGER, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Criminal Court, Queens County (D. Modica, J.), rendered June 4, 2003, convicting him, after a bench trial, of attempted assault in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.00 [1]) and harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.26 [1]), and imposing sentence.


Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that the circumstantial evidence adduced at trial was legally sufficient to establish, beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Grassi, 92 NY2d 695, 697 [1999]), defendant's guilt of attempted assault in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.00 [1]) and harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240. 26 [1]), and the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]). Defendant's remaining contentions are not preserved for appellate review or lack merit.
Decision Date: July 21, 2004

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.