Frey v Culligan

Annotate this Case
[*1] Frey v Culligan 2004 NY Slip Op 50576(U) Decided on June 4, 2004 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on June 4, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM : 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT:McCABE, P.J., RUDOLPH and ANGIOLILLO, JJ.
NO. 2003-653 OR C

DOUGLAS P. FREY, Appellant, -

against

CULLIGAN, Respondent.

Appeal by plaintiff from a small claims judgment of the City Court, City of Newburgh, Orange County ( J. Pastsalos, J.), entered January 8, 2003, dismissing his claim.


Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.

A review of the record on appeal in this small claims action seeking to recover
for water damages establishes that substantial justice has been done between the
parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law (see UCCA 1807; Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983]; Perez v Garcia, 304 AD2d 544 [2003]).
Decision Date: June 04, 2004

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.