A.B. Med. Servs. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Annotate this Case
[*1] A.B. Med. Servs. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 2004 NY Slip Op 50575(U) Decided on June 4, 2004 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on June 4, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM : 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT:McCABE, P.J., RUDOLPH and ANGIOLILLO, JJ.
NO. 2003-1088 N C

A.B. MEDICAL SERVICES PLLC D.A.V. CHIROPRACTIC P.C. SOMUN ACUPUNCTURE P.C. a/a/o Junior Joseph Lionel Marius Rohan Pinnach, Appellants,

against

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Repondent.

Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the District Court, Nassau County (J. Spinola, J.), entered May 19, 2003, which denied their motion for summary judgment.


Order unanimously affirmed with $10 costs.

Plaintiffs commenced the instant action to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits. In opposition to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, defendant submitted an affidavit from an investigator employed within defendant's Special Investigations Unit. Contrary to plaintiffs' contention, the investigator's detailed affidavit set forth ample facts and founded beliefs to establish the existence of a triable issue of fact as to whether there was a lack of coverage because the alleged injuries did not arise from an insured incident (see Central Gen. Hosp. v Chubb Group of Ins. Cos., 90 NY2d 195, 199 [1997]). As a result, plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment was properly denied.

Plaintiffs' remaining contentions are also lacking in merit.
Decision Date: June 04, 2004

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.