S&M Supply v Allstate Ins. Co.
Annotate this CaseDecided on May 28, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM : 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT:PESCE, P.J., PATTERSON and GOLIA, JJ.
NO. 2003-1232 K C
S&M SUPPLY INC., a/a/o MUREL VOLCANT, MARIE PIERRE and ANNE SAINTFORT, Appellant,
against
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the Civil Court, Kings County (D. Silber, J.), dated June 30, 2003, which denied plaintiff's motion for a default judgment.
Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
The motion court properly held that plaintiff's acceptance of the answer without objection, constituted a waiver of the late service and default (Ligotti v Wilson, 287 AD2d 550 [2001]). The case of Nasca v Gertel (5 AD3d 367 [2004]) is not to the contrary. In that case the defendant was not deemed to have waived the late service of the answer and the default since the answer was served after the plaintiff moved for leave to enter a default judgment.
__________________________________
Decision Date: May 28, 2004
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.