A Class Act Limousine of Long Is. v Sievers

Annotate this Case
[*1] A Class Act Limousine of Long Is. v Sievers 2004 NY Slip Op 50470(U) Decided on March 30, 2004 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on March 30, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM : 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT:McCABE, P.J., LIFSON and SKELOS, JJ.
NO. 2003-972 S C

A CLASS ACT LIMOUSINE OF LONG ISLAND, INC., Appellant,

against

HERBERT J. SIEVERS, III, Respondent.

Appeal by plaintiff from a commercial claims judgment of the District Court, Suffolk County (L. Donohue, J.), entered on December 18, 2002, after trial, in favor of defendant dismissing the action.


Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.

In this commercial claims action by an employer to recover damages against its employee for the cost to repair its automobile, defendant cannot be held liable for the damages to plaintiff's vehicle as there has been no showing of misconduct, negligence, or lack of skill on the part of the defendant in operating the vehicle. While plaintiff disputes the defendant's account of how the vehicle sustained damages, the trier of fact was presented with issues of credibility, and the resolution thereof should not be disturbed. Accordingly, substantial justice was done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law (UDCA 1807-A).
Decision Date: March 30, 2004

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.