People v Curtin (Brad)

Annotate this Case
[*1] People v Curtin (Brad) 2004 NY Slip Op 50455(U) Decided on May 21, 2004 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on May 21, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM : 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: McCABE, P.J., RUDOLPH and ANGIOLILLO, JJ.
NO. 2002-1188 S CR

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

against

BRAD J. CURTIN, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from judgments of the Justice Court, Town of East Hampton, Suffolk County ( R. Walker, J.), rendered July 16, 2002, convicting him of violating East Hampton Town Ordinance 246 sections 13 and 14, and sentencing him to fines of $100 on each violation.


Judgments of conviction unanimously reversed upon the law, appearance tickets dismissed and fines, if paid, remitted.

Appearance tickets/summonses are not accusatory instruments and their filing does not give a criminal court jurisdiction over the named defendant. Thus, the failure to file with the court proper accusatory instruments charging the person named in the [*2]
appearance tickets with the offenses specified therein mandates reversal of the judgments of conviction and dismissal of the summonses (see People v Cooperman and O'Dell, NYLJ, Jan. 17, 1989 [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists]).
Decision Date: May 21, 2004

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.