McGee v Richard Donnelly Inc.
Annotate this CaseDecided on February 25, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM : 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT:McCABE, P.J., LIFSON and SKELOS, JJ.
NO. 2003-377 S C
THOMAS McGEE, Appellant-Respondent,
against
RICHARD DONNELLY INC., d/b/a YOUR FLOOR STORE, Respondent-Appellant.
Appeal by plaintiff from a small claims judgment of the District Court, Suffolk County (E. Sperzel, J.), dated April 19, 2002, in favor of defendant dismissing the action for failure to prove damages and cross appeal by defendant insofar as the court failed to dismiss on the further ground that plaintiff failed to establish defendant's liability.
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.
In this small claims action seeking to recover damages from defendant for allegedly selling a defective carpet, the record reveals that plaintiff failed to establish liability. Accordingly, the dismissal of the small claims action was proper albeit on grounds other than stated by the court below. Under the circumstances, substantial justice was done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law (UDCA 1804, 1807; see Ross v Friedman, 269 AD2d 584 [2000]; Williams v Roper 269 AD2d 125, 126 [2000]).
Decision Date: February 25, 2004
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.