Hayes v Mia's Bathhouse for Pets

Annotate this Case
[*1] Hayes v Mia's Bathhouse for Pets 2016 NY Slip Op 51644(U) Decided on November 16, 2016 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on November 16, 2016
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Schoenfeld, J.P., Shulman, Gonzalez, JJ.
570509/16

Cheryl A. Hayes, Plaintiff-Respondent,

against

Mia's Bathhouse for Pets and Lachena Clark, Defendants-Appellants.

Defendants appeal from a judgment of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Carol Feinman, J.), entered on or about November 10, 2015, after trial, in favor of plaintiff and awarding her damages in the principal sum of $3,500.

Per Curiam.

Judgment (Carol Feinman, J.), entered on or about November 10, 2015, held in abeyance and the matter remanded to Civil Court for issuance of a decision in conformity with the requirements of CPLR 4213(b).

The trial court failed to comply with CPLR 4213(b) in rendering judgment in plaintiff's favor without setting forth its rationale or the basis for the computation of damages. Inasmuch as this small claims action hinges in large measure on issues of credibility, we hold the appeal in abeyance and remand the matter for issuance of a decision setting forth the essential facts as required by CPLR 4213(b) (see Brenner v De Bruin, 171 AD2d 833 [1991]).


THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: November 16, 2016

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.