Vladenn Med. Supply, Corp. v American Commerce Ins. Co.

[*1] Vladenn Med. Supply, Corp. v American Commerce Ins. Co. 2016 NY Slip Op 50775(U) Decided on May 17, 2016 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on May 17, 2016
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Shulman, J.P., Hunter, Jr., Ling-Cohan, JJ.
570430/15

Vladenn Medical Supply, Corp. a/a/o Jocelyn Noel, Plaintiff-Respondent,

against

American Commerce Ins. Co., Defendant-Appellant.

Defendant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Joseph E. Capella,, J.), entered May 24, 2013, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Per Curiam.

Order (Joseph E. Capella,, J.), entered May 24, 2013, affirmed, without costs.

We sustain the denial of defendant-insurer's motion for summary judgment dismissing this first-party, no-fault action. Defendant failed to "meet its burden by proof in admissible form, because it submitted no evidence from anyone with personal knowledge of the nonappearances [at the scheduled examinations under oath (EUOs)]" (Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., 35 AD3d 720, 721 [2006]). In this regard, we note that while the affirmation of defendant's attorney described the office procedures for contacting a claimant 48 hours prior to the scheduled EUO to confirm the appearance, it failed to demonstrate personal knowledge of the office procedures when a claimant failed to appear for the EUOs on the scheduled dates (see American Tr. Ins. Co. v Lucas, 111 AD3d 423 [2013]). Nor did the affiant state that he was the attorney assigned to conduct the EUOs, (cf. Hertz Corp. v Active Care Med. Supply Corp., 124 AD3d 411 [2015]).

Insofar as the motion court also concluded that the claims were untimely denied, we note that the defense of failure to appear for EUOs may be asserted by an insurer regardless of the timeliness of the denial (see Allstate Ins. Co. v Pierre, 123 AD3d 618 [2014]; Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co. v Bayshore Physical Therapy, PLLC, 82 AD3d 559, 560 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 705 [2011]). .

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: May 17, 2016