Hanlon v Wartski

Annotate this Case
[*1] Hanlon v Wartski 2016 NY Slip Op 50413(U) Decided on March 28, 2016 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on March 28, 2016
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Hunter, Jr., J.P., Ling-Cohan, J.
570045/16

Julie Hanlon, Petitioner-Tenant-Respondent,

against

Jay Wartski, Respondent-Landlord-Appellant.

Respondent-landlord appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Phyllis K. Saxe, J.), dated May 18, 2015, after a hearing, which denied its motion for an award of attorneys' fees in a Housing Part enforcement proceeding.

Per Curiam.

Order (Phyllis K. Saxe, J.), dated May 18, 2015, affirmed, with $10 costs.

We sustain the denial of respondent-landlord's motion for attorneys' fees pursuant Housing Maintenance Code [Administrative Code of the City of New York] § 27-2115[m][4]). The underlying Housing Part proceeding was discontinued by petitioner-tenant, without opposition, and the court below made no finding that tenant's harassment claim was "so lacking in merit as to be frivolous" (Administrative Code § 27-2115[m][4]). Nor does the limited record now before us permit such finding.


THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur
Decision Date: March 28, 2016

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.