People v Pinnock (Brandon)

Annotate this Case
[*1] People v Pinnock (Brandon) 2016 NY Slip Op 50120(U) Decided on February 5, 2016 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on February 5, 2016
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Lowe, III, P.J., Schoenfeld, Shulman, JJ.
570107/14

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Brandon Pinnock, Defendant-Appellant.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Lisa A. Sokoloff, J. at plea; Laurie Peterson, J., at sentencing), rendered December 17, 2013, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of petit larceny, and sentencing him to three years of probation.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Lisa A. Sokoloff, J. at plea; Laurie Peterson, J., at sentencing), rendered December 17, 2013, affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the probationary sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe, and find no extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Fair, 33 AD3d 558, 558 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 945 [2007]). Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain, and should not now "be heard to complain that he received what he bargained for" (id. at 558, quoting People v Chambers, 123 AD2d 270, 270 [1986]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: February 05, 2016

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.