Easy Care Acupuncture P.C. v Praetorian Ins. Co.

Annotate this Case
[*1] Easy Care Acupuncture P.C. v Praetorian Ins. Co. 2015 NY Slip Op 51523(U) Decided on October 20, 2015 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on October 20, 2015
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Lowe, III, P.J., Schoenfeld, Hunter, Jr., JJ.
570472/15

Easy Care Acupuncture P.C. a/a/o Ruby Adesanya, Plaintiff-Respondent,

against

Praetorian Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant.

Defendant appeals from an order the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Jose A. Padilla, Jr., J.), entered February 11, 2015, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Per Curiam.

Order (Jose A. Padilla, Jr., J.), entered February 11, 2015, reversed, with $10 costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. (see Easy Care Acupuncture P.C. v Praetorian Ins. Co., appeal numbered 15-220, decided herewith.) The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: October 20, 2015

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.