People v Miller (Shariff)

Annotate this Case
[*1] People v Miller (Shariff) 2015 NY Slip Op 50877(U) Decided on June 10, 2015 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on June 10, 2015
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Lowe, III, P.J., Schoenfeld, Shulman, JJ.
570809/11

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, -

against

Shariff Miller, Defendant-Appellant.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (John Cataldo, J.H.O.), rendered October 6, 2011, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of disorderly conduct, and imposing sentence. Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (John Cataldo, J.H.O.), rendered October 6, 2011, reversed, on the law and on the facts, accusatory instrument dismissed, and fine, if paid, remitted.

As the People now concede, defendant's conviction must be vacated since the trial court failed to make any inquiry whatsoever to determine whether defendant's absence from the trial proceedings was deliberate (see People v Brooks, 75 NY2d 898, 899 [1990]; People v Carroll, 196 AD2d 546 [1993], lv denied 82 NY2d 848 [1993]). Since it does not appear that further proceedings on the disorderly conduct charge here involved would serve any useful penological purpose (see People v Burwell, 53 NY2d 849, 851 [1981]), we dismiss the accusatory instrument, a disposition unopposed by the People.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur

Decision Date: June 10, 2015

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.