People v Verdelli (Gian)

Annotate this Case
[*1] People v Verdelli (Gian) 2014 NY Slip Op 51410(U) Decided on September 22, 2014 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on September 22, 2014
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Shulman, J.P., Hunter, Jr., Ling-Cohan, JJ.
570250/11

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, -

against

Gian Verdelli, Defendant-Appellant.

Defendant appeals from an order of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Neil E. Ross, J.), entered June 14, 2011, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender and a predicate sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

Per Curiam.

Order (Neil E. Ross, J.), entered June 14, 2011, modified by vacating the determination that defendant is a predicate sex offender and, as modified, affirmed.

The People met their burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, risk factors bearing a sufficient total point score to support a level two sex offender adjudication. Defendant's challenge to the 30-point assessment based upon his prior criminal history is lacking in merit, since he was previously convicted of a misdemeanor sex offense (see People v Kraeger, 42 AD3d 944 [2007]; People v Davis, 38 Misc 3d 127[A], 2012 NY Slip Op 52362[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2012], lv dismissed 20 NY3d 1093 [2013]). The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant a downward departure from his presumptive risk level (see People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]). However, as the People concede, the court erred in classifying defendant as a predicate sex offender.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concurI concur I concur
Decision Date: September 22, 2014

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.