Ogando v 807 Realty Co., LLC
Annotate this CaseDecided on November 26, 2010
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Shulman, J.P., McKeon, Schoenfeld, JJ
570727/10.
Nievelina Ogando, Plaintiff-Appellant,
against
807 Realty Co., LLC,
NOVEMBER 26, 2010 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT Nove mber 2010 Term Shulman, J.P., McKeon, Schoenfeld, JJ. NY County Clerk's No. 570727/10 Calendar No. 10-371 Nievelina Ogando, Plaintiff-Appellant, -against- 807 Realty Co., LLC, Defendant-Respondent. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Tanya R. Kennedy, J.), entered on or about February 23, 2009, after trial, in favor of defendant dismissing the action. Per Curiam. Judgment (Tanya R. Kennedy, J.), entered on or about February 23, 2009, affirmed, without costs. The record and ends of substantial justice (see CCA 1804, 1807) support the judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the claims after trial of this small claims action, since plaintiff failed to present competent evidence to support her claim that defendant was responsible for the bedbug condition in her apartment. THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT. Decision Date: November 26, 2010 Defendant-Respondent.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of
New York, New York County (Tanya R. Kennedy, J.), entered on or about February 23, 2009,
after trial, in favor of defendant dismissing the action.
Per Curiam.
Judgment (Tanya R. Kennedy, J.), entered on or about February 23, 2009, affirmed, without costs.
The record and ends of substantial justice (see CCA 1804, 1807) support the judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the claims after trial of this small claims action, since plaintiff failed to present competent evidence to support her claim that defendant was responsible for the bedbug condition in her apartment.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: November 26, 2010
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.