RR Reo II, LLC v Miah
Annotate this CaseDecided on July 19, 2010
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKeon, P.J., Shulman, Hunter, Jr., JJ
570128/10.
RR REO II, LLC, Petitioner-Landlord-
against
Muhammed Miah III, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant.
Tenant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County
(Bruce E. Scheckowitz, J.), dated February 5, 2010, which denied his motion, inter alia, to vacate
a stipulation of settlement in a nonpayment summary proceeding.
Per Curiam.
Order (Bruce E. Scheckowitz, J.), dated February 5, 2010, affirmed, with $10 costs.
Tenant failed to demonstrate legal cause to vacate the "so-ordered" stipulation settling the
underlying nonpayment summary proceeding (see Chelsea 19 Assoc. v James, 67
AD3d 601 [2009]) or explain his violations of the payment terms unambiguously set forth in
both the settlement stipulation and the order from which tenant now appeals, which afforded him
additional time to remedy his prior rent defaults.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: July 19, 2010
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.