Silver v I.S.T.A. Mgt. Co.
Annotate this CaseDecided on June 29, 2010
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKeon, P.J., Shulman, Hunter, JJ
570391/09.
Alexander Silver, Plaintiff-Respondent, - -
against
I.S.T.A. Management Co. Defendant -and- BLDG. Management Co., Defendants-Appellants.
Defendant BLDG Management Co. appeals from a judgment of the Small Claims Part of the
Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Matthew F. Cooper, J.), entered on or
about January 29, 2008, after trial, in favor of plaintiff and awarding him damages in the
principal sum of $4,052.
Per Curiam.
Judgment (Matthew F. Cooper, J.), entered on or about January 29, 2008, affirmed, without costs.
A judgment issued in the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court will be sustained on appeal
unless it is shown that "substantial justice has not been done between the parties according to the
rules and principles of substantive law" (CCA 1807; see Williams v Roper, 269 AD2d
125 [2000], lv dismissed 95 NY2d 898 [2000]). Applying that limited review standard
here, and since the record permits a finding that plaintiff-tenant vacated the apartment premises
as a result of ongoing, legitimate safety concerns for himself and his pregnant wife and the
delays attendant to defendant's investigation of the source of the "rancid" odor throughout the
apartment, we find no basis to substitute our judgment for that of the trial court in casting
defendant in damages on plaintiff's "breach of lease" claim.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: June 29, 2010
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.