People v Mohammed (Loutfy)
Annotate this CaseDecided on June 29, 2010
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKeon, P.J., Shulman, Hunter, JJ
570754/06.
The People of the State of New York,
against
Loutfy Elgoh Mohammed, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New
York County (Alexander B. Jeong, J.), rendered August 9, 2006, after a jury trial, convicting him
of resisting arrest, and imposing sentence.
Per Curiam.
Judgment of conviction (Alexander B. Jeong, J.), rendered August 9, 2006, affirmed.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury's credibility determinations. The evidence satisfied the "authorized arrest" element of resisting arrest (Penal Law § 205.30), since it established that police had probable cause to arrest defendant for petit larceny. Further, defendant could properly be convicted of resisting arrest even without being convicted of the underlying petit larceny charge (see People v Laltoo, 22 AD3d 230 [2005]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: June 29, 2010
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.