Zinger v Levinson
Annotate this CaseDecided on April 7, 2010
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKeon, P.J., Shulman, Hunter, JJ
570722/09.
Ludmilla Zinger, Plaintiff-Appellant,
against
Bruce Levinson, Esq., Defendant-Respondent.
Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York
County (Peter H. Moulton, J.), entered July 30, 2009, which granted defendant's motion for
summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Per Curiam.
Order (Peter H. Moulton, J.), entered July 30, 2009, affirmed, with $10 costs.
In opposition to defendant's prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing this legal malpractice action, plaintiff failed to raise any triable issue regarding whether, "but for" defendant's alleged negligence, plaintiff would have obtained succession rights to the subject rent stabilized apartment premises (see generally Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008 [1996]; Barbara King Family Trust v Voluto Ventures, LLC, 46 AD3d 423 [2007]). Accordingly, the complaint was properly dismissed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT
Decision Date: April 07, 2010
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.