People v Alexander (Hans)
Annotate this CaseDecided on December 3, 2007
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Davis, J.P., Schoenfeld, Heitler, JJ
570045/05.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
against
Hans Alexander, Defendant-Appellant,
Defendant appeals from an order of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx
County (Seth L. Marvin, J.), dated March 10, 2006, which denied his CPL 440.10 motion to
vacate a prior judgment of the same court and judge, rendered October 6, 2004, convicting him,
upon a plea of guilty, of resisting arrest, and imposing sentence.
PER CURIAM:
Order (Seth L. Marvin, J.), dated March 10, 2006, affirmed.
Defendant's present challenge to the facial sufficiency of the accusatory instrument is
unavailing. Allegations that at a specified time and location police, responding to a "domestic
dispute in the street," observed defendant screaming at a woman, with a crowd of about 40
people gathered, and that defendant yelled at the responding officers "while holding his fingers as
if a gun," were sufficient for pleading purposes to make out a prima facie case of disorderly
conduct (see Penal Law § 240.20[1]; see generally People v Casey, 95
NY2d 354, 360 [2000]). Given the lack of merit to defendant's facial sufficiency claim, his
satellite contention that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the sufficiency of the
accusatory instrument must also be rejected.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE
COURT.
Decision Date: December 3, 2007
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.