People v Green (Albert)
Annotate this CaseDecided on October 4, 2007
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McCOOE, J.P., SCHOENFELD, HEITLER, JJ
570617/05.
People of the State of New York, Respondent,
against
Albert Green, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New
York County (Geraldine Harris, J.), rendered July 15, 2005, convicting him, upon a plea of
guilty, of assault in the third degree and imposing sentence.
Per Curiam.
Judgment of conviction (Geraldine Harris, J.), rendered July 15, 2005, affirmed.
Defendant's present challenge to the adequacy of his plea allocution is not preserved for
appellate review since he failed to move to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of
conviction (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]), and we decline to review it
in the interest of justice. Were we to review the claim, we would find it to be without merit.
There is no "uniform mandatory catechism of pleading defendants," only that it be demonstrable
that the plea was voluntary, knowing and intelligent (see People v Nixon, 21 NY2d 338,
353 [1967], cert denied sum nom. Robinson v New York, 393 US 1067 [1969], which is
shown by a review of the minutes herein. Defendant, who had extensive contacts with the
criminal justice system and was actively represented by counsel, was expressly informed by the
court that a final order of protection was a condition of sentencing.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: October 4, 2007
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.