Taccad v Cabrera
Annotate this CaseDecided on March 21, 2007
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKEON, P.J., DAVIS, SCHOENFELD, JJ
570456/06.
Gloria Taccad, Plaintiff-Appellant,
against
Teresita F. Cabrera, No.06-343 Defendant-Respondent.
Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Anil C. Singh, J.), entered October 3, 2005, which denied her motion to vacate a stipulation of settlement.
PER CURIAM:
Order (Anil C. Singh, J.), entered October 3, 2005, affirmed, with $10 costs.
Plaintiff has shown no legal basis to set aside the settlement stipulation entered into in open court upon the advise of counsel (see Hallock v. State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, 230 [1984]). Although plaintiff's appellate arguments lack merit, we do not find them to be frivolous within the meaning of 22
NYCRR 130-1.1.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: March 21, 2007
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.