Felix v Hymowitz
Annotate this CaseDecided on March 21, 2007
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKEON, P.J., DAVIS, SCHOENFELD, JJ
570470/06.
Yves J. Felix, Plaintiff-Appellant,
against
Lee O. Hymowitz, Defendant-Respondent.
Plaintiff, as limited by his brief, appeals from that portion of a judgment of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County, (Jeffrey K. Oing, J.), entered on or about January 24, 2006, after trial, which limited his recovery of damages to the principal sum of $500.
PER CURIAM:
Judgment (Jeffrey K. Oing, J.), entered on or about January 24, 2006, affirmed, without costs.
On this record, and in view of plaintiff's failure to show a causal connection between the legal fees he incurred after retaining another attorney and the alleged failure of defendant to return plaintiff's client file as requested, we are satisfied that the damage award in plaintiff's favor was neither inadequate nor
inconsistent with the mandate of "substantial justice" (CCA 1807).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: March 21, 2007
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.