Bronx Radiology, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co.
Annotate this CaseDecided on March 5, 2007
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKEON, J.P., McCOOE, HEITLER, JJ
570702/06.
Bronx Radiology, P.C. a/a/o Tisha Kirkland, Plaintiff-Respondent,
against
State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co., Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Raul Cruz, J.), entered July 21, 2005, after a nonjury trial, in favor of plaintiff in the principal amount of $1,791.93.
PER CURIAM:
Judgment (Raul Cruz, J.), entered on July 21, 2005, reversed, with $30 costs, and matter remanded for further proceedings.
It was an improvident exercise of discretion to preclude defendant's medical expert from testifying because of defendant's failure to strictly comply with CPLR 3101 (d). While defendant's expert disclosure omitted the expert's qualifications, it did set forth the particulars of his expert testimony. In view of plaintiff's delay in seeking preclusion and in the absence of any showing of prejudice, the expert should have been allowed to testify (see Clark v Weber, 264 AD2d 569 [1999]).
This constitutes the decision and order of the court.
I concurI concurI concur
Decision Date: March 5, 2007
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.