Stubbs v Marmo
Annotate this CaseDecided on February 21, 2007
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKEON, P.J., DAVIS, SCHOENFELD, JJ
.
Nancy Stubbs, Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 570508/06
against
Linda Mov Marmo, Defendant-Respondent.
Plaintiff appeals from (1) a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Arthur F. Engoron, J.), entered December 16, 2005, after a nonjury trial, in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint, and (2) an order (same court and Judge), dated April 5, 2006, which denied plaintiff's motion for a new trial.
PER CURIAM:
Judgment and order (Arthur F. Engoron, J.), entered December 16, 2005 and April 5, 2006, respectively, affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff's complaint was properly dismissed. To the extent that plaintiff's action was based upon allegations of harassment, New York does not recognize a common-law cause of action for harassment (see Edelstein v Farber, 27 AD3d 202 [2006]), and the conduct complained of did not give rise to any other cognizable cause of action or basis for tort liability.
This constitutes the decision and order of the court.
[*2]
Decision Date: February 21, 2007
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.