Gotlib v Hee Nam Bae
Annotate this CaseDecided on February 16, 2007
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKEON, P.J., DAVIS, SCHOENFELD, JJ
570454/06.
Kerry Gotlib, Plaintiff-Appellant,
against
Hee Nam Bae, Defendant-Respondent.
Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.) entered March 2, 2006, which granted defendant's motion to vacate his default and denied plaintiff's cross motion for partial summary judgment.
PER CURIAM
Order (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered March 2, 2006, modified to grant partial summary judgment to plaintiff in the principal amount of $13,396.17, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs.
In view of the parties' written retainer agreement, which contains an unequivocal acknowledgment that defendant owed plaintiff $13,396.17 in legal fees, plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment should have been granted. We note that plaintiff does not now challenge the vacatur of defendant's default.
This constitutes the decision and order of this court.
Decision Date: February 16, 2007
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.