Shih v Gan

Annotate this Case
[*1] Shih v Gan 2007 NY Slip Op 50071(U) [14 Misc 3d 131(A)] Decided on January 17, 2007 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on January 17, 2007
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKEON, P.J., McCOOE, SCHOENFELD, JJ
570471/06.

Joy Shih, Plaintiff-Appellant,

against

Anand Gan, Defendant-Respondent.

Plaintiff appeals from that portion of an order of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), dated May 25, 2006, which denied her motion to "amend" the judgment to increase the damages award.


PER CURIAM:
Appeal from Order (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), dated May 25, 2006, dismissed, without costs, as academic.

Subsequent to the filing of this appeal, the underlying judgment was vacated and the complaint dismissed. Thus, any issue as to the inadequacy of the judgment is academic.
This constitutes the decision and order of the court.
Decision Date: January 17, 2007

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.