People v Perry (Jonah)
Annotate this CaseDecided on January 17, 2007
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKEON, P.J., McCOOE, SCHOENFELD, JJ
570249/03.
People of the State of New York, Respondent,
against
Jonah Perry, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Gerald Harris, J.), rendered January 23, 2003, convicting him, after a jury trial, of driving while intoxicated, endangering the welfare of a child, and driving while ability impaired, and imposing sentence.
PER CURIAM:
Judgment of conviction (Gerald Harris, J.), rendered January 23, 2003, affirmed.
The court properly granted the People's challenge for cause to a prospective juror. To the extent that the juror ultimately provided a purported assurance of impartiality, such assurance was "less-than-unequivocal" (People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 363 [2001]) when viewed in context. "Where there is any doubt, the court should err on the side of disqualification because the worst the court will have done in most cases is to have replaced one impartial juror with another impartial juror" (People v Oliveri, 29 AD3d 330, 331 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 760 [2006]).
Defendant's claim that his conviction for driving while ability impaired (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192[1]) should be dismissed as a lesser inclusory concurrent count of driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law §1192[2]) is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Silverio, 252 AD2d 358 [1998]), lv denied 92 NY2d 930 [1998]). In any event, driving while ability impaired is not a lesser included offense of driving while intoxicated under subsection two of Vehicle and Traffic Law §1192, the blood alcohol level crime (see People v Brown, 53 NY2d 979, 981 [1981]).
This constitutes the decision and order of the court.
Decision Date: January 17, 2007
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.