MHM Sponsors Co. v Vernon

Annotate this Case
[*1] MHM Sponsors Co. v Vernon 2005 NY Slip Op 52012(U) [10 Misc 3d 131(A)] Decided on December 9, 2005 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on December 9, 2005
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT:
DECEMBER 9, 2005
June 2005
Suarez, P.J., Davis, Schoenfeld, JJ., Justices.


MHM Sponsors Co., Petitioner-Respondent, NY County Clerk's No. 570494/05

against

Bernard Vernon, Natalie Vernon, Calendar No. 05-149 Respondents-Appellants, John Doe" and/or "Jane Doe," Respondents.

Tenants appeal from a final judgment of the Civil Court, Bronx County (Brenda S. Spears, J.), entered on or about July 8, 2004 after a nonjury trial, awarding landlord possession of the subject premises in a nonprimary residence holdover proceeding.


PER CURIAM:

Final judgment (Brenda S. Spears, J.), entered on or about July 8, 2004, affirmed, with $25 costs.

In evaluating the history of this tenancy and the factors bearing on the tenants' nexus to the premises, we
agree that landlord met its burden of establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that tenants did not use the apartment as a primary residence (cf. Greenbriar Co. v Lipsman, 11 AD3d 352 [2004], affd __ NY3d __, 2005 NY LEXIS 2630). Indeed, evidence from a recent prior proceeding indicates that tenants maintained the apartment more for storage than habitation.

This constitutes the decision and order of the Court.
Decision Date: December 09, 2005

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.