People ex rel. Renfroe v Warden, Yaphank Corr. Facility

Annotate this Case
People ex rel. Renfroe v Warden, Yaphank Corr. Facility 2016 NY Slip Op 07824 Decided on November 21, 2016 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 21, 2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
L. PRISCILLA HALL
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.
2016-11340 DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT

[*1]The People of the State of New York, ex rel. Christopher Renfroe, on behalf of Demetri Stewart, petitioner,

v

Warden, Yaphank Correctional Facility, respondent.



Renfroe Driscoll & Foster, LLP, Forest Hills, NY (Christopher Renfroe pro se of counsel), for petitioner.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Lauren Tan of counsel), for respondent.

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application for bail reduction upon Suffolk County Indictment No. 01782B/15.



ADJUDGED that the writ is sustained, without costs or disbursements, and bail on Suffolk County Indictment No. 01782B/15 is reduced to the sum of $200,000 which may be posted in the form of an insurance company bail bond in that sum or by depositing the sum of $100,000 as a cash bail alternative; and it is further,

ORDERED that upon receipt of a copy of this decision, order and judgment together with proof that the defendant has given an insurance company bail bond in the amount of $200,000 or has deposited the sum of $100,000 as a cash bail alternative, the Warden of the facility at which the defendant is incarcerated, or his or her agent, is directed to immediately release the defendant.

DILLON, J.P., HALL, HINDS-RADIX and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.