Yahya v Kahan

Annotate this Case
Yahya v Kahan 2016 NY Slip Op 00665 Decided on February 3, 2016 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 3, 2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
BETSY BARROS, JJ.
2015-03925
(Index No. 20674/12)

[*1]Ali Yahya, etc., et al., appellants,

v

Madhury Yasmeen Kahan, et al., respondents.



Lipsig, Shapey, Manus & Moverman, P.C. (Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & De Cicco, LLP, New York, NY [Brian J. Isaac and Michael H. Zhu], of counsel), for appellants.

Kelly, Rode & Kelly, LLP, Mineola, NY (John W. Hoefling of counsel), for respondents.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), entered March 10, 2015, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants demonstrated their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by providing evidence establishing that the infant plaintiff entered a roadway from between two parked cars and immediately came into contact with the left side of the defendants' moving vehicle, just above the front tire, and thus, the defendant-driver was unable to avoid contact with the infant plaintiff (see Rodriguez v Catalano, 96 AD3d 821, 822; Wolbe v Fishman, 29 AD3d 785, 786; Sae Hyun Kim v Marisis, 286 AD2d 761; Blazer v Tri-County Ambulette Serv., 285 AD2d 575, 576; Carrasco v Monteforte, 266 AD2d 330, 331). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant-driver operated the vehicle in a negligent manner. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

MASTRO, J.P., AUSTIN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.