Spodek v Neiss

Annotate this Case
Spodek v Neiss 2016 NY Slip Op 02801 Decided on April 13, 2016 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 13, 2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
JEFFREY A. COHEN
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX, JJ.
2014-03709
(Index No. 32644/96)

[*1]J. Leonard Spodek, also known as Leonard Spodek, et al., plaintiffs,

v

Charles Neiss, etc., et al., appellants, Moses Fried, et al., respondents.



Robert Hiltzik, Jericho, NY, for appellants.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), entered February 5, 2014, which, on the court's own motion, appointed a receiver of certain premises in Brooklyn.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

No appeal lies as of right from an order which does not decide a motion made on notice, and leave to appeal has not been granted (see CPLR 5701[a][2]; Garcia v Eurobunby USA, 120 AD3d 623).

BALKIN, J.P., ROMAN, COHEN and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.