Jean-Pierre v Park

Annotate this Case
Jean-Pierre v Park 2016 NY Slip Op 03139 Decided on April 27, 2016 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 27, 2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
SANDRA L. SGROI
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
2014-00698
(Index No. 700344/11)

[*1]Denise Jean-Pierre, appellant,

v

Sarah Ok Park, et al., respondents.



William Pager, Brooklyn, NY, for appellant.

Tromello, McDonnell & Kehoe, Melville, NY (Stephen J. Donnelly, Jr., of counsel), for respondents.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lebowitz, J.), entered November 20, 2013, as granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the subject accident.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendants met their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys ., 98 NY2d 345; Gaddy v Eyler , 79 NY2d 955, 956-957). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp ., 68 NY2d 320, 324). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the subject accident.

In light of our determination, we need not address the defendants' remaining contentions.

MASTRO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, SGROI and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.