People v Harrison
Annotate this CaseDecided on April 6, 2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
RUTH C. BALKIN
JEFFREY A. COHEN
BETSY BARROS, JJ.
2013-11397
(Ind. No. 369/13)
[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
v
Frank Harrison, appellant.
Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, NY (Laura Boyd of counsel), for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano and Johnnette Traill of counsel; Danielle O'Boyle on the brief), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), rendered November 21, 2013, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, his guilty plea was valid. Guilty pleas are valid only if they are "knowing, voluntary, and intelligent" (People v Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375, 382; see People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 16-17; People v Murrell, 135 AD3d 882). Here, the record, examined as a whole, establishes that the defendant was aware of his constitutional rights and that he voluntarily relinquished them (see People v Harris, 61 NY2d at 17; People v Sirico, 135 AD3d 19, 22).
RIVERA, J.P., BALKIN, COHEN and BARROS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.