People v Taylor

Annotate this Case
People v Taylor 2016 NY Slip Op 02067 Decided on March 23, 2016 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 23, 2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
BETSY BARROS, JJ.
2013-05598

[*1]People of State of New York, respondent,

v

Aaron Taylor, appellant.



Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, NY (Anna Pervukhin of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and John F. McGoldrick of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Aloise, J.), dated April 25, 2013, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's application for a downward departure from his presumptive designation as a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C; hereinafter SORA). The defendant failed to demonstrate the existence of a mitigating factor of a kind or to a degree not otherwise taken into account by the SORA Guidelines that warranted a downward departure from his presumptive risk level designation (see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 4 [2006]; People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861; People v Nowicki, 133 AD3d 732, 732-733; People v Shelton, 126 AD3d 959, 960).

DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, DICKERSON and BARROS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.