People v Hyams

Annotate this Case
People v Hyams 2015 NY Slip Op 08816 Decided on December 2, 2015 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 2, 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.
2014-10944

[*1]People of State of New York, respondent,

v

James Hyams, appellant.



Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (James H. Miller III of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Edward A. Bannan of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated October 22, 2014, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant's sole contention on appeal, that the assessment of points under risk factors 5 and 6 constituted improper double counting, is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Brown, 131 AD3d 520; People v Jones, 101 AD3d 836; People v Fredlund, 38 AD3d 636) and, in any event, without merit (see People v Brown, 131 AD3d at 521; People v Caban, 61 AD3d 834, 835).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly designated the defendant as a level two sex offender (see People v Tineo-Morales, 101 AD3d 839; People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112).

DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.