Walsh v Cascone

Annotate this Case
Walsh v Cascone 2012 NY Slip Op 08299 Decided on December 5, 2012 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 5, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
ANITA R. FLORIO
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
PLUMMER E. LOTT, JJ.
2012-04103
(Index No. 100251/10)

[*1]Edward M. Walsh, respondent,

v

Toni A. Cascone, appellant.




DeSena & Sweeney, LLP, Hauppauge, N.Y. (Shawn P.
O'Shaughnessy of counsel), for appellant.
Subin Associates, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Eric D. Subin of
counsel), for respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Fusco, J.), dated March 19, 2012, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the subject accident.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant met her prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957). The defendant established, prima facie, that the plaintiff's injuries were not caused by the subject accident (cf. Jilani v Palmer, 83 AD3d 786, 787).

In opposition, however, the plaintiff submitted evidence raising a triable issue of fact as to whether the alleged injury to his right shoulder was caused by the subject accident (see Perl v Meher, 18 NY3d 208, 218-219; Sforza v Big Guy Leasing Corp., 51 AD3d 659, 661). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
RIVERA, J.P., FLORIO, DICKERSON, LEVENTHAL and LOTT, JJ., concur.

ENTER: [*2]

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.