Villa v Leandrou

Annotate this Case
Villa v Leandrou 2012 NY Slip Op 02865 Decided on April 17, 2012 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 17, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
SHERI S. ROMAN
SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.
2011-06407
(Index No. 21759/10)

[*1]Alfredo Villa, appellant,

v

Katherine Leandrou, respondent. Charles Wisell, Jackson Heights, N.Y., for appellant.




Mendolia & Stenz (Cuomo, LLC, New York, N.Y. [Sherri A.
Jayson], of counsel), for respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McDonald, J.), dated June 2, 2011, which denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

As properly determined by the Supreme Court, the plaintiff failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Thoma v Ronai, 82 NY2d 736, 737; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324). The proof submitted by the plaintiff in support of his motion failed to establish, as a matter of law, that he was free from comparative negligence (see Roman v A1 Limousine, Inc., 76 AD3d 552; McFadden v Bruno, 37 AD3d 177; Scibelli v Hopchick, 27 AD3d 720; Wallace v Dublin, 20 AD3d 412; Valore v McIntosh, 8 AD3d 662; Eastmond v Wen Po Wong, 300 AD2d 344). The failure to make such a showing requires the denial of the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, regardless of the sufficiency of the defendant's opposition papers (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.
RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.