Chase Home Fin., LLC v Quinn

Annotate this Case
Chase Home Fin., LLC v Quinn 2012 NY Slip Op 08479 Decided on December 12, 2012 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 12, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
2011-05640
(Index No. 21747/07)

[*1]Chase Home Finance, LLC, respondent,

v

Miguel Quinn, et al., appellants. Walter T. Ramsey, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellants.




Stein, Wiener & Roth, LLP, Carle Place, N.Y. (Jonathan M.
Cohen of counsel), for respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Miguel Quinn and Blanca Quezada Ahmed appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), entered April 13, 2011, which denied their motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court entered September 5, 2008, upon their default in appearing or answering.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the appellants' motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale. The appellants failed to proffer any evidence that the plaintiff procured the judgment of foreclosure and sale by fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct (see CPLR 5015[a][3]; Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v Hornes, 94 AD3d 755). Furthermore, a letter dated January 25, 2011, which was not in existence at the time the judgment of foreclosure and sale was entered, does not meet the criteria for newly discovered evidence pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(2) (see Coastal Sheet Metal Corp. v RJR Mech. Inc., 85 AD3d 420, 421; Matter of Ayodele Ademoli J., 57 AD3d 668, 669).

The appellants' remaining contentions are without merit.
DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, AUSTIN and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.