Matter of Zawyer C.

Annotate this Case
Matter of Zawyer C. 2012 NY Slip Op 03638 Decided on May 8, 2012 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 8, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO, J.P.
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
2011-04943
(Docket No. D-19974-10)

[*1]In the Matter of Zawyer C. (Anonymous), appellant. Cabelly & Calderon, Jamaica, N.Y. (Alan S. Cabelly of counsel), for appellant.




Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y.
(Larry A. Sonnenshein and Diana Lawless of counsel), for
respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, Zawyer C. appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Lubow, J.), dated April 8, 2011, as, upon a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), entered August 27, 2010, made upon her admission, finding that she had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of attempted criminal mischief in the fourth degree, placed her in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months, with credit for time spent in detention from February 14, 2011, to March 4, 2011.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The only issues raised by the appellant concern that portion of the order of disposition which placed her in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months, with credit for time spent in detention from February 14, 2011, to March 4, 2011. Since the placement has expired, the appeal must be dismissed as academic (see Matter of Gawen M., 90 AD3d 1051, 1052, lv deniedNY3d, 2012 NY Slip Op 71316 [2012]; Matter of Eric R., 78 AD3d 841; Matter of Delroy A., 73 AD3d 912). Contrary to the appellant's contention, this matter does not warrant invoking the exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714).
ANGIOLILLO, J.P., DICKERSON, LEVENTHAL and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.