Matter of Lord L.B. (Melissa N.)

Annotate this Case
Matter of Matter of Lord L.B. (Melissa N.) 2012 NY Slip Op 03833 Decided on May 15, 2012 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 15, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
PETER B. SKELOS, J.P.
ANITA R. FLORIO
ARIEL E. BELEN
SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.
2011-00043
2011-00046
2011-00047
(Docket Nos. B-6049/07, B-16532/06, B-16533/06)

[*1]In the Matter of Lord L. B. (Anonymous). MercyFirst, et al., petitioners-respondents;

and

Melissa N. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 1)



In the Matter of Lianu B. (Anonymous). MercyFirst, et al., petitioners-respondents;

and

Melissa N. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 2)



In the Matter of Lionel B. (Anonymous), Jr. MercyFirst, et al., petitioners-respondents;

and

Melissa N. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 3) Rhonda R. Weir, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.




Warren & Warren, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Ira L. Eras of counsel),
for petitioner-respondent MercyFirst.
Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Tamara A. Steckler and Marcia
Egger of counsel), attorney for the
children.


DECISION & ORDER

In three related proceedings to terminate parental rights pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of three orders of fact-finding and disposition (one as to each child) of the Family Court, Kings County (Danoff, J.), each dated November 8, 2010, as, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, found that she permanently neglected the children, terminated her parental rights, and transferred custody and guardianship of the children to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York and the petitioner MercyFirst, for the purposes of adoption.

ORDERED that the orders of fact-finding and disposition are affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearings established by clear and convincing proof that, for a period of one year following each child's placement with an authorized agency, the mother failed to plan for the future of each child, although physically and financially able to do so, [*2]notwithstanding the agency's diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship (see Social Services Law § 384-b[7][a]; Family Ct Act § 622; Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136, 142; Matter of Peter C., Jr. [Peter C.], 88 AD3d 702, 703; Matter of Jonathan B. [Linda S.], 84 AD3d 1078). Further, the evidence adduced at the dispositional hearing established that termination of the mother's parental rights was in the best interests of the children (see Family Ct Act § 631; Matter of Walter D.H. [Zaire L.], 91 AD3d 950, 950-951; Matter of Peter C., Jr. [Peter C.], 88 AD3d at 703; Matter of Amber D.C. [Angelica W.], 79 AD3d 865, 866).

The mother's remaining contentions are without merit.
SKELOS, J.P., FLORIO, BELEN and SGROI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.