People v Palmer
Annotate this Case
People v Palmer
2012 NY Slip Op 03669
Decided on May 8, 2012
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on May 8, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, A.P.J.
MARK C. DILLON
RANDALL T. ENG
PLUMMER E. LOTT
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
2010-08434
(Ind. No. 2189/08)
[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
v
Michael R. Palmer, appellant.
Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Barry Stendig of counsel),
for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard
Joblove and Diane R. Eisner of
counsel; Gregory Musso on the
memorandum), for the respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Decided on May 8, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, A.P.J.
MARK C. DILLON
RANDALL T. ENG
PLUMMER E. LOTT
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
2010-08434
(Ind. No. 2189/08)
[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
v
Michael R. Palmer, appellant.
Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Barry Stendig of counsel),
for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard
Joblove and Diane R. Eisner of
counsel; Gregory Musso on the
memorandum), for the respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Foley, J.), imposed November 4, 2009, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his claim that his sentence was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255).
MASTRO, A.P.J., DILLON, ENG, LOTT and MILLER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.